This a neat pedal for single channel amps

Jondog · Post by **Jondog** » Sat Jan 31, 2015 9:10 pm

http://tonereport.com/news/mad-professor-unveils

Les Paul Lover · Post by **Les Paul Lover** » Sat Jan 31, 2015 9:24 pm

That's a very good pedal indeed.

Defo something I'd consider seriously using with my AD15 - I haven't found the right balance between cleans / dirt / lead yet. Not far off, but not quite there.

That could be a neat solution really.

Randy Bass · Post by **Randy Bass** » Sat Jan 31, 2015 9:25 pm

That seems like a great idea. I invented the concept of an "underdrive" pedal like 3 weeks ago though, so I'm super pissed at those dudes.

Les Paul Lover · Post by **Les Paul Lover** » Sat Jan 31, 2015 10:01 pm

Randy Bass wrote:That seems like a great idea. I invented the concept of an "underdrive" pedal like 3 weeks ago though, so I'm super pissed at those dudes.

Like the dark terror, always ahead, but without the goods.....

Ronnie Robinson · Post by **Ronnie Robinson** » Sat Jan 31, 2015 10:02 pm

Ooh very interesting! I'd really like to hear the results that could be a good option for my T T

Post by **bclaire** » Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:56 pm

Hmm. Wouldn't it be cheaper and easier to just roll back the volume on your guitar?

thejay · Post by **thejay** » Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:49 am

Cheaper and easier but why do that when you can get a pedal

Neat idea... Interested in hearing it but not sure it's something I would be picking up. Mad professor makes some quality gear though I have had a couple pedals in the past

Jondog · Post by **Jondog** » Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:13 am

bclaire wrote:Hmm. Wouldn't it be cheaper and easier to just roll back the volume on your guitar?

Yes, but the pedal is based around the overdrive frequencies to clean the amp up giving you more control.

Jondog · Post by **Jondog** » Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:16 am

Randy Bass wrote:That seems like a great idea. I invented the concept of an "underdrive" pedal like 3 weeks ago though, so I'm super pissed at those dudes.

I thought this was your sig. pedal. Those bastards!

Jondog · Post by **Jondog** » Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:19 am

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4xQpLB ... l=85114404

Mystic38 · Post by **Mystic38** » Sun Feb 01, 2015 2:08 am

curious.. is there any benefit to this vs, say setting a clean then using a boost that has an eq?.. it seems that in both cases you set one tone manually and set the other with the pedal.

i would be interested to know how others approach the similar situation..for tonal/volume variety?

in my case, i have tried..
a) EH nanopad as switchable attenuator (2 options)
b) Compressor for boost plus Overdrive with EQ (4 options)
c) currently the ParaEQ + boost (3 options, sadly cannot have boost without EQ)

Jondog · Post by **Jondog** » Sun Feb 01, 2015 2:35 am

Mystic38 wrote:curious.. is there any benefit to this vs, say setting a clean then using a boost that has an eq?.. it seems that in both cases you set one tone manually and set the other with the pedal.

i would be interested to know how others approach the similar situation..for tonal/volume variety?

in my case, i have tried..
a) EH nanopad as switchable attenuator (2 options)
b) Compressor for boost plus Overdrive with EQ (4 options)
c) currently the ParaEQ + boost (3 options, sadly cannot have boost without EQ)

You won't get the same crunch or overdrive tone your amp produces on it's own as you're hitting the front end of the pre-amp with a boost. The amps volume or gain control comes after the first gain stage.

Ronnie Robinson · Post by **Ronnie Robinson** » Sun Feb 01, 2015 5:44 am

Mystic38 wrote:curious.. is there any benefit to this vs, say setting a clean then using a boost that has an eq?.. it seems that in both cases you set one tone manually and set the other with the pedal.

i would be interested to know how others approach the similar situation..for tonal/volume variety?

in my case, i have tried..
a) EH nanopad as switchable attenuator (2 options)
b) Compressor for boost plus Overdrive with EQ (4 options)
c) currently the ParaEQ + boost (3 options, sadly cannot have boost without EQ)

The difference, as far as I understand it, is that its for users want to hear their amp dirty tones as it comes - presumably those who really enjoy their amps overdrive without tweaking yet still have the option and more versatility with clean tones.

No idea how successful it will be but certainly worth looking at imo.

a.hun · Post by **a.hun** » Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:10 pm

Randy Bass wrote:That seems like a great idea. I invented the concept of an "underdrive" pedal like 3 weeks ago though, so I'm super pissed at those dudes.

Should work a treat. Concept came up HERE (again) the other day. Been doing it for years myself. Should just have kept my big mouth shut clearly...

http://forum.orangeamps.com/viewtopic.php?t=7264" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Andy.

stuart_tate41 · Post by **stuart_tate41** » Sun Feb 01, 2015 3:54 pm

Just like the Detox EQ?

This a neat pedal for single channel amps

This a neat pedal for single channel amps

Re: This a neat pedal for single channel amps

Re: This a neat pedal for single channel amps

Re: This a neat pedal for single channel amps

Re: This a neat pedal for single channel amps

Re: This a neat pedal for single channel amps

Re: This a neat pedal for single channel amps

Re: This a neat pedal for single channel amps

Re: This a neat pedal for single channel amps

Re: This a neat pedal for single channel amps

Re: This a neat pedal for single channel amps

Re: This a neat pedal for single channel amps

Re: This a neat pedal for single channel amps

Re: This a neat pedal for single channel amps

Re: This a neat pedal for single channel amps

Who is online