audix om2

Orange Amps General Forum

Moderator: bclaire

TESLA_EL34
Orange Master
Posts: 1129
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:23 pm

audix om2

Post by TESLA_EL34 » Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:40 am

seriously impressed with this mic, costs less than SM58 and it has superb feedback resistance. it sounds very good too.
amazing for the money! maybe check them out!
accept darkness.

bclaire
Forum Moderator
Posts: 17905
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 9:19 pm
Location: Outside Boston MA, USA
Contact:

Re: audix om2

Post by bclaire » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:13 pm

TESLA_EL34 wrote:seriously impressed with this mic, costs less than SM58 and it has superb feedback resistance. it sounds very good too.
amazing for the money! maybe check them out!
Thanks for the tip - I'll have to check them out!

irish_admiral
Prince of Orange
Posts: 18031
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Wales

Re: audix om2

Post by irish_admiral » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:20 pm

They're good live - they've got a bit of a mid-scoop and a spike from around 2khz which tends to help male vox in live sound. Not so good for the ladies as they can sound overly bright.

To be honest, most decent mics sound better than the 58s (before EQing) these days.
Joe

G(sus) saves

Orange AD15, Matamp 1224, Fender 'JD' Tele, G&L ASAT, Duesenberg Starplayer TV, Eggle Kanuga, Avalon D25, Warwick FNA Jazzman, Eden Nemesis / Bergantino EX112S, Eastman MD305 & other stuff...

Incubus
Rocker
Posts: 185
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 8:15 am
Location: Copenhagen

Re: audix om2

Post by Incubus » Tue Feb 19, 2013 9:58 am

Audix makes wonderful stuff... I'm using a OM7 these days... Don't think I'll be using a shure ever again :)

irish_admiral
Prince of Orange
Posts: 18031
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Wales

Re: audix om2

Post by irish_admiral » Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:52 am

Their Beta 58s are pretty good for live vox...
Joe

G(sus) saves

Orange AD15, Matamp 1224, Fender 'JD' Tele, G&L ASAT, Duesenberg Starplayer TV, Eggle Kanuga, Avalon D25, Warwick FNA Jazzman, Eden Nemesis / Bergantino EX112S, Eastman MD305 & other stuff...

Incubus
Rocker
Posts: 185
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 8:15 am
Location: Copenhagen

Re: audix om2

Post by Incubus » Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:02 pm

Not for me. I've actually always preferred the SM58 over the beta.

The Beta is way to bright... But again, it depends on the sound of your voice.

The OM7 makes everything a lot easier for me.

a.hun
Duke of Orange
Posts: 9765
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 1:05 am
Location: Amsterdam, Hollandland.nl

Re: audix om2

Post by a.hun » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:07 pm

Incubus wrote:Not for me. I've actually always preferred the SM58 over the beta.

The Beta is way to bright... But again, it depends on the sound of your voice.
It does. Some mic's suit some people better, simple as that.

When I saw Robert Plant live a few years back he appeared to be using an SM58. (With orange tape on it - thought he'd nicked mine! :lol:) A lot of pros still do use them. Why? They work well for them and they are the closest thing ever in the mic world to indestructible. Would you drop your mic 6 feet onto any solid surface? SM58s will take that and much worse!

Find what works for you. Sometimes the initial attraction of a sonic sheen - easy to get with a little lift of the high presence frequencies - can get quite wearing, or cause feedback problems. Stage vocal mics don't always have to sound completely natural, just to work with the particular voice.


Andy.
aNDyH. :wink:

Ever tried to outstare a mirror?

In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap, and much more difficult to find!

Janglin_Jack
Orange Hero
Posts: 320
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 7:56 am
Location: USA

Re: audix om2

Post by Janglin_Jack » Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:59 pm

SM58 need a lot of gain to operate at their best. I think it is upwards of 60db of clean gain. I had a Mackie PA that only put out approx 48db, and therefore the mic sounded quiet and somewhat muffled. With proper gain, the SM58 is an awesome mic. With inferior preamps, you may find it best to use another mic not so gain hungary, (Beta58 or some of the other choices listed). EQ is another consideration. One mic may sound better/worse with your voice, so try before you buy.

Mike
"...weak with evil and broken by the world."

a.hun
Duke of Orange
Posts: 9765
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 1:05 am
Location: Amsterdam, Hollandland.nl

Re: audix om2

Post by a.hun » Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:50 pm

Janglin_Jack wrote:SM58 need a lot of gain to operate at their best. I think it is upwards of 60db of clean gain. I had a Mackie PA that only put out approx 48db, and therefore the mic sounded quiet and somewhat muffled. With proper gain, the SM58 is an awesome mic. With inferior preamps, you may find it best to use another mic not so gain hungary, (Beta58 or some of the other choices listed). EQ is another consideration. One mic may sound better/worse with your voice, so try before you buy.

Mike
Never heard of that being a real problem. Mine has worked fine into about everything I've plugged it into giving decent levels, and I've plugged it into plenty. Lately that has mainly been my Mackie VLZ Pro Desk. Still, that has excellent mic preamps. You may well be right that plugging it into poor ones gives poor results.


Andy.
aNDyH. :wink:

Ever tried to outstare a mirror?

In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap, and much more difficult to find!

Janglin_Jack
Orange Hero
Posts: 320
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 7:56 am
Location: USA

Re: audix om2

Post by Janglin_Jack » Tue Feb 19, 2013 8:40 pm

a.hun wrote:
Janglin_Jack wrote:SM58 need a lot of gain to operate at their best. I think it is upwards of 60db of clean gain. I had a Mackie PA that only put out approx 48db, and therefore the mic sounded quiet and somewhat muffled. With proper gain, the SM58 is an awesome mic. With inferior preamps, you may find it best to use another mic not so gain hungary, (Beta58 or some of the other choices listed). EQ is another consideration. One mic may sound better/worse with your voice, so try before you buy.

Mike
Never heard of that being a real problem. Mine has worked fine into about everything I've plugged it into giving decent levels, and I've plugged it into plenty. Lately that has mainly been my Mackie VLZ Pro Desk. Still, that has excellent mic preamps. You may well be right that plugging it into poor ones gives poor results.


Andy.
I found it was a bit of an issue with the Mackie 808s I had, but all the guys switched to Beta 58. Some guy in a recording forum was shocked when he read the Mackie 808 spec that the gain was only 48db or whatever. Cranking a gain knob is never ideal, and cranking a gain knob to get 48db, when mic really needs closer to 60db, (in my case). Anyhow, just something to consider.

SM58/SM57 are an industry standard and used on countless stages and studios. Didn't mean to imply a big issue, just wanted to note that it is a gain hungry mic and can sound less than stellar with budget pre's. We have Mackie VLZ Pro now, too and no issues with any mics.

Mike
"...weak with evil and broken by the world."

TESLA_EL34
Orange Master
Posts: 1129
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:23 pm

Re: audix om2

Post by TESLA_EL34 » Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:12 am

I own an OM6 too and its very different from the OM2... But i agree the mic is more a voice thing...
Some of my mics sound terrible on other bandmembers. Its quite irritating first, because mics are like shoes for me.
accept darkness.

irish_admiral
Prince of Orange
Posts: 18031
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Wales

Re: audix om2

Post by irish_admiral » Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:35 am

I never get a bad sound from a SM58, but you have to EQ it, and just about every time i've ever done so on male vox, most people take a cut around 700hz to lose a lot of the mud from the un-EQd sound. For a noisy pub / club, the Beta is a better option (IMO) for rock and pop vocals as it has a bit more brightness and cut, and more gain before feedback to cope with loud stage noise. The SM58 might be better with a quieter coffee table or acoustic style set.

The SM58 might be an industry standard, but it's probably as it was one of the first dynamic mics that was mass produced, and techs everywhere were trained on them, knew how to get a good sound from them quickly, and so naturally picked them. They're definitely not the best dynamic mic available, but as Andy said, they are very durable... another reason why they turn up in a lot of places!

Although different mics suit different voices, I generally prefer Sennheiser mics over Shure as they are smoother sounding and the proximity effect is much less pronounced, which means the bass doesn't disappear alarmingly if you move an inch!
Joe

G(sus) saves

Orange AD15, Matamp 1224, Fender 'JD' Tele, G&L ASAT, Duesenberg Starplayer TV, Eggle Kanuga, Avalon D25, Warwick FNA Jazzman, Eden Nemesis / Bergantino EX112S, Eastman MD305 & other stuff...

TESLA_EL34
Orange Master
Posts: 1129
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:23 pm

Re: audix om2

Post by TESLA_EL34 » Thu Feb 21, 2013 5:12 am

i sounded like having a cold through the standard 58 on most gigs.
i really dont know why :roll:
accept darkness.

irish_admiral
Prince of Orange
Posts: 18031
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Wales

Re: audix om2

Post by irish_admiral » Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:01 pm

It's the mid-honk in them. Cut somewhere between 600-1000hz and it will go away.
Joe

G(sus) saves

Orange AD15, Matamp 1224, Fender 'JD' Tele, G&L ASAT, Duesenberg Starplayer TV, Eggle Kanuga, Avalon D25, Warwick FNA Jazzman, Eden Nemesis / Bergantino EX112S, Eastman MD305 & other stuff...

jamison162
Orange Master
Posts: 1560
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 5:03 am
Location: USA

Re: audix om2

Post by jamison162 » Thu Feb 21, 2013 4:10 pm

Check out the Heil mics, wow! I just bought 3: PR-20UT, PR-35 for vox, PR-30b for cab. Hamcity.com
Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 414 guests